Regulatory Showdown: How the Revolut-Visa Case Could Change Payment Costs for Businesses

Lily Sanborn
Mar 13
4 min read

In an increasingly globalized economy, businesses operating across borders must contend with a complex landscape of regulations. A recent dispute between Revolut, Visa, and the UK Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) underscores the legal and regulatory challenges companies face in international transactions. This case brings up a crucial question: How can businesses adjust to evolving regulatory frameworks that affect their global operations?

The Case: Revolut, Visa, and the UK PSR

The dispute centers on the UK PSR’s proposed cap on interchange fees for cross-border transactions. These fees, which banks and payment processors charge merchants for processing card payments, have been a contentious issue, particularly post-Brexit. The PSR argues that the cap will protect UK businesses from excessive costs, but fintech companies like Revolut and global payment giants like Visa claim the regulation is overreaching and could stifle competition.

Revolut and Visa have taken legal action against the PSR, arguing that the regulator exceeded its authority in imposing the cap. Their legal challenge underscores the fine line between regulatory oversight and the autonomy of businesses operating in multiple jurisdictions.

In a related development, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed an antitrust lawsuit against Visa in September 2024, alleging monopolistic practices in the debit card market. The DOJ claims Visa's actions have inflated costs for consumers and businesses alike.

The Legal Landscape for International Businesses

Companies engaged in cross-border operations must consider a range of legal factors, including:

Regulatory Compliance: Adapting to varying financial laws across different jurisdictions.
Dispute Resolution: Engaging with regulatory bodies and understanding legal recourse when conflicts arise.
Post-Brexit Financial Law: Adjusting to changes in EU-UK regulations that affect financial transactions and business operations.

The Revolut and Visa case is a prime example of how businesses must engage with regulators while also protecting their operational interests through legal challenges.

For small and mid-sized businesses engaging in international trade, regulatory changes can significantly impact transaction costs and operational efficiency. A sudden cap on interchange fees, for example, could affect the profitability of cross-border sales, requiring business owners to reassess their pricing strategies or seek alternative payment solutions.

Understanding these legal shifts is essential for staying competitive in an increasingly globalized market.

Service-based businesses that rely on international payments—such as freelancers, consultants, and SaaS providers—must ensure they have flexible and efficient payment processing systems. Adapting to fintech innovations like Revolut’s rapid payment solutions can help reduce delays, cut costs, and improve cash flow. However, business owners should also remain vigilant about how regulatory changes might alter these advantages over time.

Implications for Business Owners:

Potential Reduction in Transaction Costs: If the PSR's proposed cap is upheld, UK businesses could benefit from lower interchange fees on cross-border transactions, reducing operational costs.
Legal Uncertainty: The ongoing legal dispute introduces uncertainty. Businesses might face fluctuating transaction fees depending on the lawsuit's outcome, complicating financial planning.
Market Dynamics: A successful challenge by Revolut and Visa could maintain the status quo, potentially leading to sustained higher fees for businesses engaging in international transactions.
Increased Regulatory Scrutiny: Such lawsuits indicate heightened regulatory oversight of major payment processors, which could lead to reforms benefiting businesses through more competitive fee structures.
Potential for Alternative Payment Solutions: Legal pressures on dominant players like Visa might encourage the emergence of alternative payment networks, offering businesses more choices and potentially better terms.

Business owners should monitor these legal proceedings closely, as their outcomes could directly influence transaction costs and the competitive landscape of payment processing services.

For e-commerce businesses selling to international customers, evolving regulations around payment processing can affect transaction fees, refund policies, and overall financial planning. Business owners must stay informed about regulatory developments to avoid unexpected costs that could erode profit margins. Exploring multiple payment providers and diversifying financial partnerships can help mitigate risks.

Startups and SMEs expanding internationally should also consider the legal implications of cross-border contracts and dispute resolution. Differences in regulatory environments may require business owners to adjust terms of service, refund policies, and compliance procedures to align with local laws. Working with legal experts familiar with international finance can prevent costly missteps.

Beyond compliance, business owners can use regulatory shifts to their advantage. For example, companies that proactively adopt compliant financial solutions may gain a competitive edge over slower-moving competitors. Leveraging fintech innovations that align with regulatory requirements—such as Revolut’s streamlined cross-border payments—can enhance efficiency and customer satisfaction while avoiding legal roadblocks.

Lessons for Business Owners

For businesses operating internationally, this case provides key takeaways:

Regulatory Risk Management: Staying ahead of regulatory changes and assessing their impact on operations.
Legal Strategies for Growth: Ensuring that legal counsel is involved early to navigate international regulations.
The Role of Litigation: Knowing when to challenge regulatory decisions that could hinder business operations.

Conclusion

The Revolut and Visa case highlights the evolving regulatory landscape for businesses engaged in cross-border transactions. As financial regulators continue to adjust to the rapid growth of fintech and global commerce, businesses must remain proactive in addressing legal challenges. The broader question remains: Will regulatory bodies evolve to accommodate international businesses, or will legal disputes like this become the norm?

For further information and legal expertise, please visit our website or schedule a meeting with Keiretsu’s Brianna Gonzalez here.

The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. This publication is distributed with the understanding that the author, publisher and distributor of this communication are not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinions on specific facts or matters and, accordingly, assume no liability whatsoever in connection with its use. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact a designated Keiretsu Law representative. Pursuant to applicable rules of professional conduct, this communication may constitute Attorney Advertising.